RESOURCE PROVISIONING STRATEGIES IN HYBRID CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE
DOI: 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
DOWNLOAD ARTICLE
REVIEW REPORT
CITE THIS ARTICLE
The Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure has been adopted as a paradigm of modern enterprise computing that unites the scalability of a public cloud service environment with the security and control of a chosen on-premises enterprise resources. Resource provisioning in such environments that are part hybrid is essential in ensuring the best performance, cost-effectiveness, and service-level agreement (SLA) are met. The paper provides a detailed study on the resource provisioning strategies such as the static, dynamic, reactive, and proactive methods of hybrid cloud systems. The predictive provisioning, workload-aware scheduling, and cost-optimization frameworks, which are machine-learned, are assessed in the context of simulation analysis. We show that when used in proactive provisioning, ML significantly reduces resource over-provisioning (by 34 percent), minimizes the average response latency (by 28 percent), and also is much cost-effective (up to 41 percent) as compared to traditional threshold-based strategies. Further challenges that we find to be open include federated resource orchestration, multi-tenant isolation, and green cloud provisioning. The work adds a single taxonomy of provisioning strategies and performance benchmarking framework of hybrid cloud environments
Keywords
Article Information
Article Metrics
HOW TO CITE
Copy
R, A. (2026). Resource Provisioning Strategies in Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(03). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i3.075
R, Ajay.. "Resource Provisioning Strategies in Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 03, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i3.075.
R, Ajay.. "Resource Provisioning Strategies in Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 03 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i3.075.
References
2.R. Buyya, C. S. Yeo, S. Venugipal, J. Broberg andBrandic, Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype and reality in providing computing as the 5th utility, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 599–616, Jun. 2009.
3.A. N. Toosi, R. N. Calheiros and R. Buyya, "Interconnected cloud computing environments: Challenges, taxonomy and survey, ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–47, Jul. 2014.
4.Amazon Web Services, "Amazon EC2: Elastic Compute Cloud — Developer Guide," Amazon Web Services, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA, 2006. [Online].Available: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/
5.B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, and J. Wilkes, "Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes: 10 years of lessons learned involving container-management systems," ACM Queue, vol. 14, no. 1,7093, Jan. 2016.
6.Q. Zhang, L. Cheng, and R. Boutaba, "Cloud computing:State-of-the-art and research challenges,"Internet Serv. Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 718, May 2010.
7.N. Roy, A. Dubey, and A. Gokhale, "Efficient Autoscaling in the Cloud with the Workload Forecasting based on Predictive Models," in Proc. IEEE 4th Int.
8.T. Lorido-Botran, J. Miguel-Alonso, and J. A. Lozano, A Review of Auto-Scaling Techniques to Elastic Applications in Cloud Environments, J. Grid Comput., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 559 592, Dec. 2014.
9.A. Canziani, A. Paszke and E. Culurciello, Workload Prediction with ARIMA Model and its effects in Cloud Applications, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Cloud Netw. CloudNet (CloudNet), Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 2016, pp. 1-6.
10.Z. Li, J. Ge, H. Hu, W. Song, H. Hu, and B. Luo, Cost and Energy Aware Scheduling Algorithm of Scientific Workflow with Deadline Constraint in Clouds, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 11, no. 4,pp. 713726, Jul.Aug. 2018.
Ethics and Compliance
Indexed In
Similar Articles
Previous Article
