FROM HOMEWORK TO AI WORK: HOW GENERATIVE AI IMPACTS CRITICAL THINKING AND ACADEMIC HONESTY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE
With the rapid spread of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Grammarly, the way college students handle academic tasks has changed drastically. Students rely more and more on AI-assisted systems for generating content, summarizing, developing ideas, refining language, and solving problems. These tools help students become more efficient and lessen their mental efforts, but the extent to which they affect students' thinking processes has not been sufficiently studied. Use of AI from a cognitive standpoint can help by developing cognitive readiness, that is, processing of information faster, strategic thinking, and awareness of one's own thinking or metacognition. However, if one becomes too dependent on them, one may experience cognitive fixation, reduced ability to think of different solutions, and passive learning patterns. The relationship between the management of tasks through AI and higher-order cognitive functions such as creativity, critical thinking, and self-regulated learning brings up very significant issues related to academic development and career preparedness in the long run. The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate how managing tasks with the help of AI affects students' creativity, learning effectiveness, and career readiness through primary data gathered from college students. The study attempts to make a theoretical and empirical contribution to the changing literature on AI and education in India by merging technology adoption behavior and cognitive theory.
Rathore, A. (2026). From Homework to AI Work: How Generative AI Impacts Critical Thinking and Academic Honesty Among Undergraduate. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.102
Rathore, Aashi. "From Homework to AI Work: How Generative AI Impacts Critical Thinking and Academic Honesty Among Undergraduate." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.102.
Rathore, Aashi. "From Homework to AI Work: How Generative AI Impacts Critical Thinking and Academic Honesty Among Undergraduate." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.102.
2.Prentice-Hall.
3.Gerlich, M. (2023). AI tools in higher education: Exploring the relationship between artificial intelligence usage and critical thinking skills. Education Sciences, 13(9), 942. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/educsci13090942
4.Khrisat, A. (2025). Academic integrity in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Ethical challenges and student perceptions. Journal of Educational Ethics, 19(1), 45–60.
5.Murthy, P. (2023). Digital dependency and cognitive impacts among youth: Implications of excessive AI tool usage. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45(4), 321–326. Premkumar, K., Sharma, R., & Thomas, A. (n.d.). Generative AI and critical thinking: A systematic review of higher education research. Computers & Education Open. Advance online publication.
6.Rana, S., Mehta, P., & Kulkarni, A. (2025). Embedding generative AI in higher education pedagogy: Implications for creativity and critical evaluation. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1–18.
7.Sade, M., Cohen, N., & Weiss, L. (2024). Student engagement and motivation in AI-assisted learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2157–2175. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
8.Wiredu, J., Mensah, K., & Boateng, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence tools and undergraduate academic performance: Benefits and cognitive trade-offs. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 234–249.
9.Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.