“DIVIDEND STABILITY AND PAYOUT BEHAVIOR: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED”
The study is based on secondary data obtained from HUL annual reports, stock exchange disclosures, and financial databases. Trend analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were employed to evaluate dividend behavior and test the applicability of major dividend theories. The findings indicate consistent growth in Dividend Per Share (DPS) throughout the study period, demonstrating a stable and progressive dividend policy. A strong positive relationship was observed between profitability indicators and dividend payments, while regression results provided substantial support for Lintner’s Dividend Smoothing Model. The study further reveals that dividend payments were maintained despite significant variations in capital expenditure, suggesting limited applicability of the Residual Dividend Theory.
The study concludes that HUL follows a shareholder-oriented dividend policy characterized by stability, profitability linkage, and strategic payout management, thereby reinforcing investor confidence and long-term value creation.
Maneesha, N. S. (2026). “Dividend Stability and Payout Behavior: An Analytical Study of Hindustan Unilever Limited”. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(6). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.185
Maneesha, N.. "“Dividend Stability and Payout Behavior: An Analytical Study of Hindustan Unilever Limited”." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 6, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.185.
Maneesha, N.. "“Dividend Stability and Payout Behavior: An Analytical Study of Hindustan Unilever Limited”." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 6 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.185.
- Anand, M. (2004). Corporate dividend practices in India: An empirical study of FMCG sector. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 29(4), 85–98.
- Baker, H. K., & De Ridder, A. (2018). Payout policy in a unique environment. Journal of Business Research, 88, 238–246.
- Bhat, R., & Pandey, I. M. (2012). Dividend behavior of Indian companies under changing economic environments. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad Working Paper Series, No. 2012-03-01.
- Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and "bird in the hand" fallacies. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259–270.
- Bombay Stock Exchange. (2024). Historical Dividend Declared Information Matrix: Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (Security Code: 500696).
- Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650–659.
- Garg, P., & Ranjan, P. (2021). Corporate financial resilience during systemic shocks: Analysis of top-tier Indian blue-chip stocks. Indian Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(2), 112–129.
- Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
- Kumar, S., & Ranjan, V. (2019). Impact of cash flows and capital expenditure demands on corporate payouts: A study of CNX FMCG index companies. Journal of Financial Studies and Research, 2019, 45–58.
- Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97–113.
- Mahapatra, R. P., & Sahu, P. K. (1993). A note on determinant factors of corporate dividend behavior in India. Decision, 20(1), 1–22.
- Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433.
- Reddy, Y. S. (2006). Dividend policy in India: Asymmetric information and signaling models. NSE Research Initiative Paper, No. 124.
- in. (2024). Hindustan Unilever Ltd.: Financial Statements, Profit & Loss Accounts, Balance Sheets and Cash Flow Statements. Retrieved from https://www.screener.in/company/HINDUNILVR/
- Verma, R. K., & Gupta, A. (2022). Dividend smoothing behavior in emerging economies: An empirical evaluation of Lintner's model on Nifty