A Comparative Approach of Traditional and AI Assisted Personalized Learning for Cognitive and Comprehensiveness.

MADHAVNATH, MAHALE LALITA

doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.100

Plagiarism Passed

Peer reviewed

Open Access

A COMPARATIVE APPROACH OF TRADITIONAL AND AI ASSISTED PERSONALIZED LEARNING FOR COGNITIVE AND COMPREHENSIVENESS.

AUTHORS:

MAHALE LALITA MADHAVNATH

Mentor

Affiliation

Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Santuji Thorat College of Arts ,Science And Commerce,

DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.100

CC BY 4.0 License:

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE

REVIEW REPORT

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Abstract

AI impacts on every walk of life. It is a Qualitative study which focus on both aspects of learning. Traditional learning (T-L)and AI assisted Personalized Learning (A-I-P-L) as well. It includes kinds of learning such as Students centric, experiential, collaborative, project based. It discussed on virtual mentor, voice assistance and automatic assessment of learners. Since, Emotional attachment, counseling, mentoring to solve personal stress related issues are the pillars of traditional learning. It helps to put light on challenges in A-I-PL like privacy and security concerns, too much dependency on technology, dehumanization learning experience, unemployment in teaching profession. In spite of this, AI learning refuses one –size- fits-all approach. AI detects the learner’s needs, interests, learning style and provides the demanded literature. In the conclusion , it is a kind of SWOC analysis for cognitive and Comprehensive learning.

Keywords

Article Information

Article Metrics

Article Views

PDF Downloads

HOW TO CITE

References

Ethics and Compliance

✓ All ethical standards met

This article has undergone plagiarism screening and double-blind peer review. Editorial policies have been followed. Authors retain copyright under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The research complies with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.

Indexed In