IJSMT Journal

International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology

An International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Scholarly Journal Indexed in recognized academic databases · DOI via Crossref The journal adheres to established scholarly publishing, peer-review, and research ethics guidelines set by the UGC

ISSN: 3108-1762 (Online)
webp (1)

Plagiarism Passed
Peer reviewed
Open Access

HIDDEN RADIATION EXPOSURE: DAILY LIFE VS MEDICAL IMAGING

AUTHORS:
Diksha
Aanshi
Ishika
Kunal
Mentor
Affiliation
, Department of Radio Imaging Technology, Jagannath University, NCR, Haryana, India
CC BY 4.0 License:
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

Radiation is a natural and unavoidable part of human life, present in the environment as well as in medical imaging procedures. While many people fear radiation from diagnostic imaging such as X-rays and CT scans, they are often unaware of the hidden radiation exposure received from natural background sources like radon gas, sunlight, and soil. This study aimed to evaluate public awareness regarding hidden radiation exposure in daily life compared with medical imaging radiation. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 120 participants of different age groups using a structured questionnaire. The study assessed awareness about radiation sources, ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, natural background radiation, and imaging modalities involving radiation exposure. The results showed that the majority of participants belonged to the 15–25 years age group, with females representing a higher proportion of respondents. Most participants had heard about radiation exposure (94.2%) and believed that radiation exists in daily life (90.8%). A large proportion correctly identified multiple radiation sources and recognized radon gas as the major source of natural background radiation. Most respondents also understood that X-rays and CT scans use ionizing radiation, whereas MRI does not. Additionally, 82.5% of participants were aware that CT scans deliver higher radiation doses than conventional X-rays. Despite the overall good level of awareness, some misconceptions regarding non-ionizing radiation and natural radiation exposure were still observed. The study concludes that although awareness regarding medical imaging radiation is relatively high, hidden daily-life radiation exposure remains less clearly understood among some individuals. Public education programs are essential to improve understanding of radiation sources, reduce unnecessary fear regarding medical imaging, and promote informed healthcare decisions

Keywords
Article Metrics
Article Views
38
PDF Downloads
1
HOW TO CITE
APA

MLA

Chicago

Copy

Diksha, , Aanshi, , Ishika, & Kunal, (2026). Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.597

Diksha, , et al.. "Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.597.

Diksha, , Aanshi, Ishika, and Kunal. "Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.597.

References
 1.Khan, Ruhul & Karmaker, Nanda & Maraz, Kazi Madina & Islam, Farhana & Haque, Md Marjanul & Razzak, Md & Mollah, M Z I & Faruque, Mohammad Rashed. (2021). Fundamental characteristics and application of radiation. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 7. 10.30574/gscarr.2021.7.1.0043. 

2.Tubiana M. Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen et la découverte des rayons X [Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen and the discovery of X-rays]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1996 Jan;180(1):97-108. French. PMID: 8696882.

3.Berger M, Yang Q, Maier A. X-ray Imaging. 2018 Aug 3. In: Maier A, Steidl S, Christlein V, et al., editors. Medical Imaging Systems: An Introductory Guide [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018. Chapter 7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546155/doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96520-8_7 

4.Ketan Apte Sachin Bhide M/S Apt Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd., Pune, Maharastra, India, chapter 1 basics of radiation , https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95387-0.00013-3

5.IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: X- and Gamma (γ)-Radiation, and Neutrons. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2000. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 75.) OVERALL INTRODUCTION. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK401323/

6.Toxicological Profile for Ionizing Radiation. Atlanta (GA): Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US); 1999 Sep. 3, SUMMARY OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK597567/

7.Khan, Ruhul & Karmaker, Nanda & Maraz, Kazi Madina & Islam, Farhana & Haque, Md Marjanul & Razzak, Md & Mollah, M Z I & Faruque, Mohammad Rashed. (2021). Fundamental characteristics and application of radiation. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 7. 10.30574/gscarr.2021.7.1.0043.

8.Jain S. Radiation in medical practice & health effects of radiation: Rationale, risks, and rewards. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Apr;10(4):1520-1524. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2292_20. Epub 2021 Apr 29. PMID: 34123885; PMCID: PMC8144773.

9.Rayan, Abdalrahman M. & Adam, Ahmed & Al-Arabi, Gehad & Ahmed, Mahrous. (2025). The Applications of X-ray Technology in Medical Imaging: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Food Water Energy and Environment. 1. 36-61. 10.21608/jsfw.2025.409882.1003.

10.Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, Shah SSUD, Khan BA, Zahoor M, Ullah R, Khan FA, Sultan MA. Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 6;2022:5164970. doi: 10.1155/2022/5164970. PMID: 35707373; PMCID: PMC9192206.
Ethics and Compliance
✓ All ethical standards met
This article has undergone plagiarism screening and double-blind peer review. Editorial policies have been followed. Authors retain copyright under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The research complies with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.
Indexed In
Similar Articles
Enabling Equitable and Scalable Education Through AI:Adoption, Challenges, and Opportunities
string(19) "Sudhindra Deshpande" Deshpande, S.et al.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.108
Centralized Home Control System using IOT
string(13) "SUSIL KUMAR D" D, S. K.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.050
Review on Pharmacological Activities of Phyllanthus Niruri a Powerful Herb
string(16) "Himanshu Gangwar" Gangwar, H.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i3.396
Scroll to Top