IMPACT OF HYBRID/REMOTE WORK MODELS ON EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY AND ENGAGEMENT
Apex Institute of Business Administration, India
The widespread adoption of hybrid and remote work models represents one of the most significant transformations in workplace dynamics in recent history. Spurred initially by the COVID‑19 pandemic and sustained by advancements in technology, hybrid and remote work arrangements have redefined traditional notions of work, productivity, and employee engagement. This research examines the impact of hybrid and remote work models on employee productivity and engagement by analyzing empirical studies, theoretical frameworks, organizational strategies, and workplace outcomes. Results reveal that while remote and hybrid work models can significantly enhance flexibility, autonomy, and job satisfaction, their effects on productivity and engagement are mediated by factors such as communication practices, managerial support, technological readiness, organizational culture, and employee well‑being. The article concludes with recommendations for organizations seeking to optimize productivity and engagement in evolving work environments. Key suggestions include investing in digital infrastructure, fostering inclusive leadership practices, and implementing robust performance evaluation metrics suited to hybrid models.
Malhotra, V. R. (2026). Impact of Hybrid/Remote Work Models on Employee Productivity and Engagement. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(02), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i2.004
Malhotra, Vikram. "Impact of Hybrid/Remote Work Models on Employee Productivity and Engagement." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 02, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i2.004.
Malhotra, Vikram. "Impact of Hybrid/Remote Work Models on Employee Productivity and Engagement." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 02 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i2.004.
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218.
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. Z. (2020). Work‑from‑anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 399–419.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self‑determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Derks, D., van Mierlo, H., & Schmitz, E. B. (2014). A diary study on work‑related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: Examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 74–84.
Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‑being and work‑life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212.
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta‑analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.
Hung, S. Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H. M., & Lin, W. R. (2020). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 436–445.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.