MICRO- AND MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF BIOFLOC-BASED FISH PRODUCTION IN BIHAR: BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, FARM-LEVEL EVIDENCE AND REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS
Biofloc Technology (BFT) has gained increasing attention as an intensive and resource-efficient aquaculture system capable of addressing the biological, environmental, and economic limitations of conventional pond culture [3,11]. Bihar, an inland state of eastern India, exhibits a persistent gap between fish demand and local production, resulting in substantial dependence on inter-state fish supply [14]. The present study provides an integrated assessment of biofloc-based fish production in Bihar by examining biological mechanisms, microeconomic farm-level performance, and macroeconomic implications at the regional scale. Primary data were collected from 30 operational biofloc units across Patna, Nalanda, Vaishali, and Samastipur districts, supported by secondary information from government reports and peer-reviewed literature. Results indicate consistently low feed conversion ratios (1.10–1.20), moderate mortality rates (6–8%), and higher yield per unit area compared to traditional pond systems [17,30]. Although feed remained the dominant operational cost, microbial protein availability reduced reliance on formulated feed and improved profitability [2,23]. At the macroeconomic level, biofloc adoption contributed to employment generation, stabilization of local fish markets, and gradual reduction in dependence on inter-state imports [19]. The study concludes that biofloc technology represents a biologically efficient, economically viable, and scalable aquaculture model for inland regions with limited land and water resources.
kumar, A. (2026). Micro- And Macroeconomic Performance of Biofloc-Based Fish Production in Bihar: Biological Processes, Farm-Level Evidence and Regional Implications. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.262
kumar, Ankit. "Micro- And Macroeconomic Performance of Biofloc-Based Fish Production in Bihar: Biological Processes, Farm-Level Evidence and Regional Implications." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.262.
kumar, Ankit. "Micro- And Macroeconomic Performance of Biofloc-Based Fish Production in Bihar: Biological Processes, Farm-Level Evidence and Regional Implications." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.262.
2.Avnimelech, Y. (2007). Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bioflocs technology ponds. Aquaculture, 264(1–4), 140–147.
3.Avnimelech, Y. (2012). Biofloc technology: A practical guide book (2nd ed.). World Aquaculture Society.
4.Asche, F., Cojocaru, A. L., & Roth, B. (2018). The development of aquaculture production economics. Reviews in Aquaculture, 10(2), 353–369.
5.Azim, M. E., & Little, D. C. (2008). The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia. Aquaculture, 283(1–4), 29–35.
6.Badiola, M., Mendiola, D., & Bostock, J. (2012). Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) analysis: Main issues on management and future challenges. Aquacultural Engineering, 51, 26–35.
7.Belton, B., Little, D. C., & Grady, K. (2014). Is responsible aquaculture sustainable aquaculture? World Development, 64, 1–14.
8.Béné, C., Barange, M., Subasinghe, R., Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Merino, G., Hemre, G. I., & Williams, M. (2015). Feeding 9 billion by 2050—Putting fish back on the menu. World Development, 79, 177–196.
9.Boyd, C. E. (2015). Water quality management in aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 46(1), 1–19.
10.Boyd, C. E., & McNevin, A. A. (2015). Aquaculture, resource use, and the environment. Reviews in Aquaculture, 7(1), 1–22.