The Juridical Seat of Arbitration: A Comparative Study

SRIDHAR, KRITHIKA

doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.385

Plagiarism Passed

Peer reviewed

Open Access

THE JURIDICAL SEAT OF ARBITRATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

AUTHORS:

KRITHIKA SRIDHAR

Mentor

Affiliation

LLM (2025-26), IILM UNIVERSITY, GREATER NOIDA ADMISSION NUMBER

DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.385

CC BY 4.0 License:

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE

REVIEW REPORT

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Abstract

This paper undertakes a doctrinal and comparative analysis of the juridical seat of arbitration as the organizing axis of international commercial arbitration. Despite the seeming clarity of the UNCITRAL Model Law, the persistence of confusion between the “seat” and “venue” has led to confusion on the issue of supervisory jurisdiction, curial law, and control of annulment. This research will interrogate the conclusive role of the seat in court supervision and whether there is a real convergence on the UNCITRAL model.

Keywords

Article Information

Article Metrics

Article Views

PDF Downloads

HOW TO CITE

References

Ethics and Compliance

✓ All ethical standards met

This article has undergone plagiarism screening and double-blind peer review. Editorial policies have been followed. Authors retain copyright under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The research complies with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.

Indexed In