A Comparative Study of Legal Framewoks for the Protection of Traditional Knoweldge: India and China

C, ABDUL VAHAB

doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.626

Plagiarism Passed

Peer reviewed

Open Access

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEGAL FRAMEWOKS FOR THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWELDGE: INDIA AND CHINA

AUTHORS:

ABDUL VAHAB C

Mentor

Dr. MOHAMMED SALIM BAITULLAH KHAN

Affiliation

DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.626

CC BY 4.0 License:

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE

REVIEW REPORT

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Abstract

Indigenous and local communities' cultural, scientific, and ecological understanding is embodied in Traditional Knowledge (TK). Protecting traditional knowledge has become a global legal concern due to growing commercialization and incidents of biopiracy. The legal systems in China and India for the preservation of traditional knowledge are compared i. It highlights the advantages, disadvantages, and upcoming difficulties of statute provisions, institutional procedures, and international commitments. According to the study, China takes a more integrated approach based on intellectual property and regulations, whereas India uses databases and biodiversity laws to adopt a defensive preservation paradigm.

Keywords

Article Information

Article Metrics

Article Views

PDF Downloads

HOW TO CITE

References

Ethics and Compliance

✓ All ethical standards met

This article has undergone plagiarism screening and double-blind peer review. Editorial policies have been followed. Authors retain copyright under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The research complies with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.

Indexed In