STUDYFLOW: THE SMART STUDY PLANNER
DOI: 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
DOWNLOAD ARTICLE
REVIEW REPORT
CITE THIS ARTICLE
Students often start a semester with clear goals, but many find it difficult to turn those goals into a steady daily routine. StudyFlow: The Smart Study Planner is designed to make that routine easier by bringing task planning, deadline tracking, revision scheduling, progress monitoring, and adaptive reminders into one digital environment. This paper presents the design, implementation direction, and evaluation framework for StudyFlow, with a focus on students in secondary and higher education. The application allows students to add subjects, topics, deadlines, difficulty levels, estimated study hours, and personal preferences. Using these inputs, the planning engine creates a structured schedule, breaks larger academic goals into smaller sessions, suggests revision slots, and updates the plan when tasks are delayed. The paper also explains the system architecture, planning logic, expected outcomes, privacy considerations, and future scope. The main contribution of this work is a practical, student-friendly model for connecting academic time management with self-regulated learning principles.
Keywords
Article Information
Article Metrics
HOW TO CITE
Copy
Patel, V. (2026). Studyflow: The Smart Study Planner. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.295
Patel, Ved. "Studyflow: The Smart Study Planner." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.295.
Patel, Ved. "Studyflow: The Smart Study Planner." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.295.
References
[1] Y. Gambo and M. Z. Shakir, “Review on self-regulated learning in smart learning environment,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00157-8
[2] S. Alhazbi, A. Al-ali, A. Tabassum, and A. Al-Ali, “Using learning analytics to measure self-regulated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies in higher education,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12982
[3] B. Tabuenca, M. Kalz, H. Drachsler, and M. Specht, “Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 89, pp. 53–74, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.004
[4] O. Viberg, M. Khalil, and M. Baars, “Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: A review of empirical research,” in Proc. International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 524–533, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483
[5] R. P. Alvarez, I. Jivet, M. Perez-Sanagustin, and others, “Tools designed to support self-regulated learning in online learning environments: A systematic review,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3193271
[6] Y. Gambo and M. Z. Shakir, “Evaluating students’ experiences in self-regulated smart learning environment,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 11285–11309, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11126-0
[7] E. Araka, E. Maina, R. Gitonga, and R. Oboko, “Research trends in measurement and intervention tools for self-regulated learning for e-learning environments—Systematic review (2008–2018),” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 15, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00129-5
[8] S. Heikkinen, M. Saqr, J. Malmberg, and M. Tedre, “Supporting self-regulated learning with learning analytics interventions: A systematic literature review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 3059–3091, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11281-4
[9] W. Matcha, N. A. Uzir, D. Gašević, and A. Pardo, “A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 226–245, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2916802
[10] J. Wong, M. Baars, D. Davis, T. Van Der Zee, G.-J. Houben, and F. Paas, “Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 35, no. 4–5, pp. 356–373, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
Ethics and Compliance
Indexed In
Similar Articles
Previous Article
