IJSMT Journal

International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology

An International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Scholarly Journal Indexed in recognized academic databases · DOI via Crossref The journal adheres to established scholarly publishing, peer-review, and research ethics guidelines set by the UGC

ISSN: 3108-1762 (Online)
webp (1)

Plagiarism Passed
Peer reviewed
Open Access

COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF SEISMIC RESPONSE AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR OF INDUSTRIAL STEEL TRUSS GEOMETRIES

AUTHORS:
Pankaj
Mentor
Dr Isha Gupta
Affiliation
Department of Civil Engineering, U.I.E.T, M.D.U , Rohtak
CC BY 4.0 License:
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Industrial steel trusses are extensively used in long-span industrial buildings due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, structural efficiency, and adaptability for large unobstructed spaces. However, the seismic performance of truss systems is significantly influenced by their geometric configuration, load-transfer mechanism, stiffness characteristics, and energy dissipation behavior under dynamic loading conditions. This review paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the geometric influence on the seismic response and resilience of commonly used industrial steel truss systems, including Pratt, Howe, Warren, Fink, and Vierendeel trusses. The study synthesizes findings from recent analytical, numerical, and experimental investigations related to truss behavior under cyclic and earthquake-induced loading.

The review evaluates the seismic performance of different truss geometries in terms of ductility, stiffness degradation, redundancy, load redistribution capability, hysteretic energy dissipation, and buckling susceptibility. Furthermore, the paper examines the role of computational modeling techniques such as SAP2000, STAAD.Pro, OpenSees, and nonlinear finite element approaches in predicting the structural response of steel truss systems subjected to seismic excitation. Current seismic codal provisions and design approaches, including AISC 341, ASCE 7, Eurocode 8, and IS 800:2007, are also critically reviewed with respect to industrial steel truss applications.

The collected literature indicates that Warren truss configurations generally exhibit superior seismic redundancy and more stable energy dissipation characteristics due to their balanced force distribution and reduced stress concentration. In contrast, Vierendeel systems demonstrate comparatively lower seismic efficiency because of their bending-dominated behavior and reduced geometric stability. The review further identifies significant research gaps associated with semi-rigid connection modeling, nonlinear cyclic behavior, soil–structure interaction effects, and performance-based seismic assessment of industrial truss systems.

This paper provides a consolidated technical framework for understanding the relationship between truss geometry and seismic behavior, thereby supporting future research and aiding engineers in the selection and seismic evaluation of industrial steel truss configurations.

 
Keywords
Industrial steel truss systems; Seismic performance; Truss geometries; Dynamic loading; Finite element analysis; Hysteretic behavior; Nonlinear seismic assessment
Article Metrics
Article Views
34
PDF Downloads
2
HOW TO CITE
APA

MLA

Chicago

Copy

Pankaj, (2026). Comparative Review of Seismic Response and Structural Behavior of Industrial Steel Truss Geometries. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(6). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.036

Pankaj, . "Comparative Review of Seismic Response and Structural Behavior of Industrial Steel Truss Geometries." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 6, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.036.

Pankaj, . "Comparative Review of Seismic Response and Structural Behavior of Industrial Steel Truss Geometries." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 6 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.036.

References

  1. ARISOY, H., & YAVUZ, G. (2023). Evaluation of Different Mesh Types of Steel Roof Trusses According to AISC360-16 Code. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, 9(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.30855/gmbd.0705070

  2. Karayel, O., & Ozay, G. (2026). Seismic Performance Assessment of Special Truss Moment Frames Retrofitted with Fluid Viscous Dampers: A FEMA P695-Based Approach. International Journal of Steel Structures. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-026-01038-x

  3. Liu, H.-J., Zhang, X.-Y., Zhao, Y.-G., & Bao, E.-H. (2025). Seismic performance of steel staggered truss framing structure under strong seismic effects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.25.00068

  4. Naathan, S., A1, B., A2, K. B. K., A3, M. R., & A4, S. B. (2023a). CRITICAL REVIEW OF COMPUTER-AIDED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR STEEL INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES (Vol. 10). www.jetir.org

  5. Naathan, S., A1, B., A2, K. B. K., A3, M. R., & A4, S. B. (2023b). CRITICAL REVIEW OF COMPUTER-AIDED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR STEEL INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES (Vol. 10). www.jetir.org

  6. Patil, A. P., Sapate, P., Khandekar, S., Mhoprekar, K., Patil, S., Peth, N., & university Kolhapur, S. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Different Types of Industrial Roof Truss by Using STAAD Pro V8i Department of Civil Engineering. In IJSRD-International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| (Vol. 8). www.ijsrd.com

  7. Rodríguez, C. A., Rodríguez Pérez, Á. M., López, R., & Caparrós Mancera, J. J. (2024). Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Seismic Response in Structures: Perspectives from Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis to Pushover Analysis. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062504

  8. Stevenson, S. A., Kopp, G. A., El Ansary, A. M., & Morrison, M. J. (2026). Investigation of the uplift load path within the gable roof of a wood-frame residential building using a full-scale wind tunnel and non-linear finite element modelling. Engineering Structures, 349, 121894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121894

  9. Tang, Q., Cui, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, T. (2026). Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Hybrid Coupled Wall Systems With Friction Steel Truss Coupling Beams. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70131

  10. Wu, H., Dong, Z.-Q., Chai, Y.-Z., Meng, Q.-T., Liu, H.-D., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Seismic Performance of High-rise Segmented Rocking Truss Steel Frame with Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers. Lifeline Emergency and Safety. https://doi.org/10.26599/lles.2025.9660009

  11. AISC (2016). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-16.

  12. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

Ethics and Compliance
✓ All ethical standards met
This article has undergone plagiarism screening and double-blind peer review. Editorial policies have been followed. Authors retain copyright under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The research complies with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.
Indexed In
Similar Articles
Sextortion as a Growing Cybercrime: A Socio-Legal Analysis in the Indian Context
string(15) "Dr. Manoj Yadav" Yadav, D. M.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i3.181
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (Dei) and Organisational Culture: A Study of Inclusive Workplace Practices and Cultural Dynamics
string(13) "R. Aswinkumar" Aswinkumar, R.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.477
Legal Status and Enforceability of Smart Contracts and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (Daos) under Indian Law: A Comprehensive Analysis
string(12) "Kunal Sharma" Sharma, K.et al.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.027
Scroll to Top