CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING APPROACHES AND INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS FOR INCLUSIVE EDUCATION: A DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS IN MEGHALAYA TOWARDS VIKSIT BHARAT 2047
A quantitative descriptive research design was employed, and data were collected from a sample of 105 students using a structured questionnaire. Statistical techniques such as t-test, ANOVA, correlation, and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that there is no statistically significant relationship between constructivist learning approaches and inclusive education outcomes. Additionally, demographic variables did not significantly influence students’ engagement and participation in constructivist learning environments.
The results highlight a gap between the theoretical effectiveness of constructivist pedagogy and its practical implementation in diverse educational contexts. The study concludes that while constructivist approaches hold strong theoretical value, their effectiveness depends largely on contextual factors such as teacher preparedness, institutional support, and availability of resources. Therefore, achieving inclusive education requires a holistic and context-sensitive approach beyond instructional methods alone.
Hajong, A. (2026). Constructivist Learning Approaches and Instructional Methods for Inclusive Education: A Demographic Analysis of Students in Meghalaya towards Viksit Bharat 2047. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(6). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.210
Hajong, Archana. "Constructivist Learning Approaches and Instructional Methods for Inclusive Education: A Demographic Analysis of Students in Meghalaya towards Viksit Bharat 2047." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 6, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.210.
Hajong, Archana. "Constructivist Learning Approaches and Instructional Methods for Inclusive Education: A Demographic Analysis of Students in Meghalaya towards Viksit Bharat 2047." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 6 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i6.210.
- Arega, N. T., & Hunde, T. S. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation-based evidence for effectiveness. Review of Education, 13(1), e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040
- Bambang Budi Wiyono, Ali Imron, Raden Bambang Sumarsono, Khalip Musa, & Rohaida Binti Mohd. Saat. (2026). (PDF) The effect of constructivist learning and project-based learning model on students’ entrepreneurial competence in higher education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395458751_The_effect_of_constructivist_learning_and_project-based_learning_model_on_students'_entrepreneurial_competence_in_higher_education
- Boyd, T., Harz, D., & Besche, H. (2024). The Role of Inclusion in Collaborative Learning. Medical Science Educator, 34(4), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02045-5
- Chand, S. (2024). Constructivism in Education: Exploring the Contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 12, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800
- Çibukçiu, B. (2025). The relationship between constructivist approach and inclusive education in primary school. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1600711
- Coleman, J. S. (with Georgetown University Law Library). (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington] U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education; [for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Govt. Print. Off.]. http://archive.org/details/equalityofeducat0000cole_a0h5
- Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Gender Gaps in Achievement and Participation in Multiple Introductory Biology Classrooms. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204
- Gal, C., & Ryder, C. H. (2025). Unlocking Potential: Comparing collaborative and Traditional Learning Methods for Students with Learning Disabilities in Special Education Classrooms. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101521
- Haataja, E. S. H., Niemivirta, M., Holm, M. E., Ilomanni, P., & Laine, A. (2024). Students’ socioeconomic status and teacher beliefs about learning as predictors of students’ mathematical competence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(2), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00791-5