IJSMT Journal

International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology

An International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Scholarly Journal Indexed in recognized academic databases · DOI via Crossref The journal adheres to established scholarly publishing, peer-review, and research ethics guidelines set by the UGC

ISSN: 3108-1762 (Online)
webp (1)

Plagiarism Passed
Peer reviewed
Open Access

A COMPARATIVE USABILITY STUDY OF STANDARD AND ACCESSIBILITY-OPTIMIZED MOBILE E-COMMERCE INTERFACES FOR ELDERLY USERS IN INDIA

AUTHORS:
Anousha Mohapatra
Khushi Chandel
Prashanth Cherian Kochuveetil
Mentor
Affiliation
CC BY 4.0 License:
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

Purpose


This study examines how an accessibility-optimised mobile interface (larger fonts, bigger targets, and simpler navigation) affects usability for Indian smartphone users aged 60+.


 Design/methodology/approach


In a within-subject experiment, participants performed tasks (finding a product, filtering, and checking out) on each interface. We recorded completion rates, errors, time-on-task, and System Usability Scale (SUS) scores. Data were analysed with paired t-tests (Wilcoxon tests if needed), using Cohen’s d and Cronbach’s alpha.


Findings


The accessibility-optimized interface received significantly higher usability satisfaction scores than the standard interface (M = 43.33 vs. 31.33; t(29) = 5.860, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.070), with improvements across all 10 SUS items. Task-based measures similarly favoured the optimized design.


Research limitations/implications


The lab setting and participant group may limit generalisability; future work should test these interventions in diverse, real-world contexts. The within-subject design provides strong evidence of interface effects.

Keywords
Article Metrics
Article Views
64
PDF Downloads
0
HOW TO CITE
APA

MLA

Chicago

Copy

Mohapatra, A., Chandel, K. & Kochuveetil, P. C. (2026). A Comparative Usability Study of Standard and Accessibility-Optimized Mobile E-Commerce Interfaces for Elderly users in India. International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, 02(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.074

Mohapatra, Anousha, et al.. "A Comparative Usability Study of Standard and Accessibility-Optimized Mobile E-Commerce Interfaces for Elderly users in India." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.074.

Mohapatra, Anousha,Khushi Chandel, and Prashanth Kochuveetil. "A Comparative Usability Study of Standard and Accessibility-Optimized Mobile E-Commerce Interfaces for Elderly users in India." International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.074.

References
1.Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

2.BarrierBreak. (2025). Digital accessibility report: India.

3.Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, I. L. McClelland, & B. Weerdmeester (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

4.Clark, C., & Kimmons, R. (n.d.). Cognitive load theory. In EdTech Books Encyclopedia.

5.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

6.Kumar, R. (2005). Usability engineering. In Human computer interaction. Laxmi Publications.

7.Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

8.HelpAge India. (2025). Understanding intergenerational dynamics and perceptions on ageing.

9.Johnson, J. (2014). Designing with the mind in mind: Simple guide to understanding user interface design guidelines (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.

10.Lewis, J. R. (2018). Measuring perceived usability: The CSUQ, SUS, and UMUX. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(12), 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805

 
Ethics and Compliance
✓ All ethical standards met
This article has undergone plagiarism screening and double-blind peer review. Editorial policies have been followed. Authors retain copyright under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The research complies with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.
Indexed In
Similar Articles
Sovereign Silks: The Agency And Authority of Women in the Sikh Empire (1799–1849)
string(11) "Rahul kumar" kumar, R.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i3.017
Wireless Environment Safety Monitoring System using Gas Sensor and Sound Sensor
string(9) "A. Akhila" Akhila, A.et al.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i4.230
Impact of Work from Home on Employee Discipline and Time Management
string(21) "Jagtap Chhaya Bhagwat" Bhagwat, J. C.
(2026)
DOI: 10.55041/ijsmt.v2i5.244
Scroll to Top